Ethics

Aristotle believed that virtue separated us from other animals and it was virtue that made an individual truly virtuous. Aristotle explained virtue as the mean between two extremes. He believed that every individual had inclinations and appetites that needed to be satisfied. However, it was virtue that ensured that an individual did not indulge in excess or denial.

Aristotle believed that there were two kinds of virtue the intellectual virtue, which was supported by reason and wisdom   and the moral virtue that sought individual excellence and happiness and ensured social benevolence. He believed that virtue was a habit inculcated within an individual that was formed by upbringing and experiences in life. Virtue was the ability to decipher between right and wrong actions and the character to choose the right action based on social norms and personal beliefs.

Aristotles approach towards virtue has its drawbacks as has been cited by De George (2006), who argues that there are grey areas and circumstances wherein the line between right and wrong actions is blurred i.e. murder by way  of self defense is not immoral. Thus, virtue should be considered in the light of actions that makes the self and others happy and protects oneself and society from harm and over indulgence of any sort.

 It must also be kept in consideration that in the veracity of competition and  to survive in the practical world, it is sometimes impossible to be truly virtuous, as individual may have take to  certain steps  to survive in a dog eat dog world,  that may not truly fulfill the edicts to true virtue   A virtuous life leads to individual fulfillment and happiness as a person of virtue refrains from acts that causes harm to oneself or others and leads a life that is free of over-indulgence and denial. Where choices are made based on reason, wisdom and humanity. A virtuous person is able to lead a complete life without guilt and fear of punishment that comes with committing crimes against individuals and society.