Language as a tool in describing the world Accurate or Not
Unfortunately, despite of the cited effectiveness of language, it is still not free of weaknesses and an example of which is depicted on the argument of explicitness which states that the effectiveness of language as a vehicle of thought is affected by the explicitness of the instrument of thought and the explicitness of the natural language (Gabbott Hogg, 2000, pg. 384). It argues that the interpretation of language is dependent on the completeness and stability of the meaning in different states and cultural subgroups (Gabbott Hogg, 2000). Hence, it is being said here that the weakness of language is seen on the subjectivity that may be attributed in the interpretation of individuals on major concepts or ideas that are given to them (Gabbott Hogg, 2000). One practical illustration of this is seen in the event whenever non-verbal communications are misinterpreted (Vicente Martinez-Manrique, 2008). This misinterpretation is a product of the pre-formed biases of the individual regarding the different types of meaning that may be attributed to each of the non-verbal gestures (Vicente Martinez-Manrique, 2008). In general, it can be said that language is an effective tool in describing the word but proper interpretations are still limited by the subjectivity and biases that each individual possess in relation to his or her cultural origins.
0 comments:
Post a Comment